best astrologer in the world
Astrology, Numerology, Palmistry, Vaastu and ♥ ♦ ♠ ♣     for     Result-Oriented-Remedies, Spiritual Guidance, Divine Help, Distance Healing, Simple-Swift Solutions & Answers for Success, Security, Honour, Health, Wealth, Peace & Prosperity.
Who am I?    Why am I here?    What is in my Future?    What is my Life-Path?    Can I do something Good for the World?
How many Women/Men/Partners are there in my Life?    How will be 2014 for me?

Translate in
Your Language

best astrologer in the world Spiritual Remedies

Distance Healing

Free Consultation Form

Consultation Charges

Do consult me if you are in deep trouble and all other doors are closed.
Spiritual Saint Osho Rajneesh Spiritual Saint Mehar Baba Spiritual Saint Swami Prabhupada Spiritual Saint Ramkrishna Paramhans Spiritual Saint Swami Vivekananda

Astrology addresses the following questions:

How can I feel happy and content in life?

In which areas have I developed strengths and talents to aid me in my current life, including career?

For what purpose have I incarnated? Why am I here?

What are my Soul's evolutionary intentions for this life?

How can I understand the essence of my own being?

Why am I the way that I am?

Why do I have repeating life experiences?

What are the unique talents and gifts that I brought into this lifetime?

What memories or traumas does my soul carry from past lives that have created patterns in my thinking and reactions, affecting me in my current life?

First Sign of the Zodiac - Aries Second Sign of the Zodiac - Taurus Third Sign of the Zodiac - Gemini Fourth Sign of the Zodiac - Cancer Fifth Sign of the Zodiac - Leo Sixth Sign of the Zodiac - Virgo Seventh Sign of the Zodiac - Libra Eighth Sign of the Zodiac - Scorpio Ninth Sign of the Zodiac - Sagittarius Tenth Sign of the Zodiac - Capricorn Eleventh Sign of the Zodiac - Aquarius Twelfth Sign of the Zodiac - Pisces




Enter for Predictions, Remedies, Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology and Horoscope

Astrologer of Astrologers


http://kDF-pHJK-systemKUI.siteAS40URE.net/_0000000/10323


10323--------------------10323Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19743
Hi yes we can answer fo the same.Predict through horary charts. for the given number particular lagna (Read: Lagna LAGN Batata Hai by S.M.Pinaki) will rise. fix the 9th cusp as the lagna (Read: Lagna LAGN Batata Hai by S.M.Pinaki) of the third party and analyse the same thorough xth,6th as well as 5th cusp and then DBAS periods. Sahhasra Saagara On Sat, 20/9/08, alokshriv1 alokshriv1. wrote: From: alokshriv1 alokshriv1.Subject: [] querry about win in election by a neutarl person , which house to be judged?To: Date: Saturday, 20 September, 2008, 10:58 AM Respected KP stalwarts, if a neutral person who is neither interested in a party or a candidate and asks about outcome of election then what house should be considered as a principal house of reference? Many times such querries come from neutral persons those are not bothered about outcome and only want to know just out of curosity or otherwise hidden reason, in such circumstances , to find principal house of reference is a tricky thing. Can such questions be answered in your opinion ! Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19744
Dear MK Thanks a lot. Sahhasra Saagara On Sat, 20/9/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology. wrote: From: Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology.Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a yearTo: Date: Saturday, 20 September, 2008, 4:01 PM Dear Saagara Sir,Thank you for the good wishes.My ICS Software is presently undergoing a change in set-up for betterment and is likely to be ready within a month or so. I shall let you know the new price in a week's time.I am yet to go through your chart for the points you have asked me.I shall come back to you with my opinion soon.  With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025 -- -From: Sagar S ssagar86. coTo: gro upsSent: Friday, September 19, 2008 12:44:36 AMSubject: Re: [] Re: days in a year Dear MK soon after i got my natal chart in ur SW , i replied with thanks for ur service. I want to know that 11th November 1992 (as per the chart errected by me Mer/Ven/JUP started on 11th Nov 1992) as per ur SW it differs with Mer/Ven/Sat, would u feel 360 days calculation will give the accuracy and what r the important points significance u found on 11th Nov 1992 as one of the important (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) made as per KP horary proved very accurate and Mr.S.Bangarappa resignied on 11th Nov 1992 as i have predicted on 26th August 1992. This (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) made me in to the lime light , name, fame and prosperity through people rushed to my home for their horoscope. i hope u r doing very well in this field and ur BTR method bring a new wave in BTR   I wish u all the best at all moments.   Due to lack of fund i have not purchased ARRAICHUR"S SW/kp3.0 and i wish to have ur SW by ICS. Let me know the cost of it so i can try to buy it in the near future. Sahhasra Saagara On Wed, 17/9/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology wrote: From: Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a yearTo: gro upsDate: Wednesday, 17 September, 2008, 10:23 PM Dear Friend, Of course. Anyone can have his own way. I have more than 50 charts, rather in hundreds with me.Let me give a suggestion. Take it if you like it or just drop it. I won't mind.Please try to compare at least 5 to 10 charts to start with.Cast two charts for a native, one with 365.25 days and the other with 360 days.Check out a few past events and see for yourself. Then one can come to a conclusion. With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025 -- -From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan To: gro upsSent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:42:42 PMSubject: Re: [] Re: days in a year Dear Mohankumar They have discussed in depth in all aspect but could not come to a conclusion. Therefore they have decided to follow what Mr.KSK said.   Even if we start the discussion on this subject, we can not come to a conclusion accepted by all. So we can concentrate in some other topics, leaving it as 365.24 days. If any one is getting correct (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) with 360 days, it should be proved for at least 50 charts.   Dhanabalan On Wed, 9/17/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology wrote: From: Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a yearTo: gro upsDate: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:52 AM Dear Friends."This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK,If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK.We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason?What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year calculation and the (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) also comes out true?  In such case, a person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular eventWe cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter.  With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025 -- -From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan To: gro upsSent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PMSubject: Re: [] Re: days in a year Dear Agarwal   The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.   Dhanabalan On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in agarwal_dphot. com wrote: From: dpa54in agarwal_dphot. comSubject: [] Re: days in a yearTo: gro upsDate: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM one has to calculate or use available software In gro ups, rao chitturu csr162002. wrote: Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general usewith 365 days a year On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in agarwal_dp . wrote: From: dpa54in agarwal_dp . Subject: [] days in a year To: gro ups Date: Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get betterresults. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. , onhelp. / l/in// // tools/tools- 08.html/ Add more friends to your and enjoy! Invite them now. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19745
22 Sep 2008   Dear Sir   Is your TIME OF BIRTH is correct? You have given 11:45 pm   Regards   RG   From: [to:] On Behalf Of Luther Rath Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 2:55 PM To: Subject: Re: [] querry about win in election by a neutarl person , which house to be judged?   Dear Sir, Please see the attachment for an example. Kindly reply after studying the detail. With regards. Dr. Luther   -- - From: alokshriv1 alokshriv1. To: Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:58:43 AM Subject: [] querry about win in election by a neutarl person , which house to be judged? Respected KP stalwarts, if a neutral person who is neither interested in a party or a candidate and asks about outcome of election then what house should be considered as a principal house of reference? Many times such querries come from neutral persons those are not bothered about outcome and only want to know just out of curosity or otherwise hidden reason, in such circumstances , to find principal house of reference is a tricky thing. Can such questions be answered in your opinion !  
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19746
In my case, the asc is exactly on the cusp between Aquarius & Pisces. A change in timing of 2 to 4 minutes will take the ascendant from Aquarius to Pisces and due to this the house lordships will urdergo a change. Secondly, if two persons take up the rectification by "ruling planets" from two diametrically opposite continents, the ruling planets will also be different. In such a case how does one go about rectification of chart. I have given my birth details below: DOB: 22nd June, 1961 TOB: 23:38 (IST) POB: Bhimavaram, AP, Lat:16N32, Long:81E32 Could any of the experts throw light on this.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19747
dear sudhir ji, my birth details 18-9-1984 7- 43 am Latitude: 13° 11' -1" N Longitude: 79° 38' -1" E place : tiruttani On Fri, 19/9/08, Sudhir taurus.sudhir. wrote: From: Sudhir taurus.sudhir. Subject: Re: [] when will i get a job To: Date: Friday, 19 September, 2008, 8:54 PM Hello Balaji: Post birth details Regards Sudhir On 9/19/08, balaji.VS balu_yourslovingly .co. in wrote: dear members. i am balaji doing M.tech in Chennai. Coming December job recruitment going to start in my collage. i am not so confident for the interview. and also i am having very low marks in my previous semesters. please tell me when will i get a job? my no : 76 if u can tell a solution it'll be a great helpful to me, thanks in advance, yours balaji vs. -- Sudhir Consulting Astrologer
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19748
Dear Dhanabalan Ji, Sure, I would Regards, K.Babu In , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan. wrote: Dear Baukrcbe Pleae go through the file section to see the earlier messages. I have posted 12 charts. Let us discuss about those charts. Already 3 charts have been taken for discussion. You can also participate in the discussion and give your views. Don't bother about your views are correct or not correct.   Dhanabalan  On Sat, 9/20/08, babukrcbe babukrcbe. wrote: From: babukrcbe babukrcbe. Subject: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: Date: Saturday, September 20, 2008, 4:49 PM Dear Dhanabalan Ji, How many KP (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s you have done in this forum ??? I'm wondering if I have failed to read all messages in this forum. Regards, K.Babu In gro ups, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan . wrote: Dear Sheetal I admit that my (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s went wrong in k.p. Why can't you put your analysis and prove yourself. In my opinion all are in my level only.    Dhanabalan On Fri, 9/19/08, Sheetal ratnamalag . wrote: From: Sheetal ratnamalag . Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: gro ups Date: Friday, September 19, 2008, 11:53 AM Dear Dhanabalan   I am reading your postings regularly and u wrote-   " I have already posted 12 birth details. More than 1000 members are in this forum. No one has confident(!) to tell the date of marriage for the charts posted except Mr.Nayan. Can you tell the date of marriage for those charts."   Why don't u put your analysis for your 12 charts, one by one mentioning wrong or write side of the rules? We all will try to respond your  queries made in your analysis. Why you want to taste the knowledge and confidence if 1000 members? why you write such things? U don't have guts to show your analysis and always want to taste others' knowledge. Isn' t it funny?   Regards Dr Sheetal                    On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Subhash subhash_ektare wrote: Dear Mr Dhanbalan, You are welcome to dis-agree with me. It is your choice. There are many senior and experienced KP Astrologers like Mr. Raichur, Mr. Tin Win, Mr. Lajmi and Mr. Gondhalekar to name a few. When they are not accepting your challenge, there must be some reason. I am like a kid in their comparision, so question of my coming forward does not arise. In Horary, as explained by Shri KSK, moon reveals whether the question is genuine or not. If it is not, Guruji has advised not to proceed further regarding (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . Logically speaking , in Natal Charts also, if the intention of the querist is other than seeking an answer to the question (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) will be off the mark because of absence of urge. In this case your challenge is for testing the knowledge of Astrologer. So the urge for getting answer is definately missing. Naturally there won't be any urge as far as the Astrologer is concerned. So two plus two is Four. Again you are welcome to dis-agree with me. But there are my sincere views. Ragards Subhash Ekatare In gro ups, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan . wrote: Dear Subhash Ektare I do not agree your statement "Guruji KSK has come up with wonderful "Krishnamurthy Paddhati" after studying THOUSANDS (not hundreds) cases. He made rules based on his observation and study of these cases. Many senior and learned Astrologers are practicing KP now. At least in my knowledge, nobody asked him to prove his rules. They trusted it must be based on vast experience and research. Many of them shifted to KP only after practicing and experiencing better accuracy in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) ." I have already posted 12 birth details. More than 1000 members are in this forum. No one has confident to tell the date of marriage for the charts posted except Mr.Nayan. Can you tell the date of marriage for those charts. Dhanabalan On Wed, 9/17/08, Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare . wrote: From: Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare . Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: gro ups Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 2:41 PM Dear Members, Guruji KSK has come up with wonderful "Krishnamurthy Paddhati" after studying THOUSANDS (not hundreds) cases. He made rules based on his observation and study of these cases. Many senior and learned Astrologers are practicing KP now. At least in my knowledge, nobody asked him to prove his rules They trusted it must be based on vast experience and research. Many of them shifted to KP only after practicing and experiencing better accuracy in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . Similarly, there are many new theories like KB, Dr. Kar's Theory and 4 Step Theory etc. I am sure these are the results of untiring research and efforts by respective inventor. There may be some shortfalls/drawback s in each of them. There can be healthy discussion in the forum with an aim to improve, not asked to prove their respective theories. Even after giving proof through 100 cases, who is to certify it ? Where is the authority acceptable to all? Nobody has forced any member to follow certain theory. They are wise enough to choose the appropriate theory. These are my personal views. As far as 4 step Theory is concerned, I am 100% sure, Mr. Sunil Gondhalekar will welcome any constructive suggestion for improving the theory. Dr. Sheetal's observation "It is so interesting to see, whatever the topic of discussion, it cannot be completed without involvement of FOR STEP" is worth noting. Subhash Ektare -- - From: Sheetal ratnamalagg. com To: gro ups Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:35:40 PM Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Hello I am not very experienced, whatever I am writing is my understanding. 1.Though we need 100 cases to make/break the rule but when we get some finding constantly in few cases even 5-10 cases,u start getting clue that it may be the rule and start working further. And sometimes, we see even after 100 cases, established rule is not always correct.It is not the number only, but also the sincerity of the perosn who makes and breaks the rules (All knows how the data is collected for theisis and manipulations are made in drawing conclusions before submission many times!!!) 2. It is so interesting to see, whatever the topic of discussion, it can not be completed without involvement "FOUR STEP". In horary, the rule "retrograde planet or star doesnt give the result" is disproving slowly and is written by many. Also some have written that it delays the result and dosnt deny. I also feel it delays the result but with only few examples I can't claim. In four steps, it doesn't give result in transit means Mr Sunil didn't write any thing against his statement of retrograde planet not giving the result. Actually after coming to the conclusion that perticular incidence will happen in this vidasha, then we have to see the transit and if Dasha lords are transiting through retrograde star and sub (in only in 1st 2 steps) will not give the result in that perticular transit as retrograde planet has a delaying effect and so till that time it passess through another sub or star. It seem to be very simple only after understanding 4step thoroughly. Regards Dr Sheetal On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:12 PM, tw853 tw853. com wrote: Dear Friend, 1. No rule works for each and every chart. The rules are usually set on the basis of majority outcome of the charts studied. The life of each and every native is not set like in the mathematical equation. That is why we'are still far away fron near cent percent accuracy of (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . 2. Breaking a rule and making a rule are two sides of a coin. Breaking a rule is generally making a opposite rule. For instance, by saying Guruji KSK's retrogression is not working in one's experience, it is making a rule of no retrogression in horary. By saying so more obligation is to provide a proof of supporting charts. 3. If retrograde is not working in 'horary, natal and RPs', how can retrograde work in checking transit's agreement with DBA is food for thought for logical reasoning. Thanks and regards, tw In gro ups, "dubeyamitkumar" dubeyamitkumar . wrote: Respected sir I have great respect for you but here I disagree with you in this "standard requirement is 100 charts to break a rule".I beleive that even 2-3 chart is enough for this but offcourse to make a rule atleast 100 charts should be required. If rule really works then it should work in each and every chart with least exception for same type of query. With Regards AMIT In gro ups, "tw853" tw853 wrote: A KP beginner is to follow Guruji KSK till at least 50 horary charts (standard requirement is 100 charts to break a rule.) have been posted showing Guruji KSK's retrogression is not working. Shri Kuppu Ganapathi and Shri Bhatt (except in special cases) are the same as Guruji KSK. Up to now any single practical chart has not yet been posted in this regard other than here say one's experience. To break a rule deeds other than words are needed. Regards, tw In gro ups, "sunilalaka" sunilalaka wrote: dear friends, what beginners to follow? KSK/Kuppuganapati or CR Bhatt? -sunil gondhalekar In gro ups, "tw853" tw853 wrote: Dear Friends, 1. Let me put the question straight: what did Shri Hasbe write in any of his books or teach regarding retrogressionn after directly learning from Guruji KSK-- Quote- "our GREAT GURUJI has categorically stated in HIS lectures and writings that retrograde Planets do not give results if they come as Star/Sub Lords to the Significators. ." -Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi (Guidelines for Preparing and Judging a Horary Chart as per K.P. or K.P. Principles in KPEZine) (A learner direct from Guruji KSK) Unquote 2. As far as my tracing system goes, Mr. Sunil Gondhalekar has never ever said in his 4 step book or any internet discussion that his view on retrogression is Shri Hasbe's, other than saying his experience based on the application of mainly natal, rarely horary. Thanks and regards, tw In gro ups, Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare wrote: Dear Member, It is a fact that Late Shri Jyotindra Hasbe learned KP directly from Guruji KSK. He has written 4 books on KP, of course all in Marathi. Shri Sunil Gondhalekar was practicing traditional Vedic Astrology from 1970. He met Shri Hasbe Guruji during 1980 and shifted to KP. Shri Gondhalekar was Hasbe Guruji's direct disciple. So he can throw some light on views of Hasbe Guruji about retrogression. It may be brought to the notice of members that Late Shri Hasbe was to start a magazine to spread KP in Maharashtra. But due to his untimely demise he could not fulfill his dream. Shri Sunil Gondhalekar fulfilled this dream and is editing and publishing a magazine "Nakshatrache Dene", in Marathi, since Diwali 1993 till date. In every magazine he writes that this was original idea of Late Hasbe Guruji. Regards Subhash Ektare -- - From: tw853 tw853 To: gro ups Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 5:46:17 AM Subject: [] Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Dear Friends, Could any one kindly share Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression as he is from the first generation who learned directly from Guruji KSK like Shri Kuppu Ganapathi. Thanks and regards, tw
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19749
Dear Ramani Ji, I have been reading Dhanabalan's message for quite long time. I respect his views and I did not read any of his message based on (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . It is my fault as I have missed to read those message. No malicious intentions in my message and I request you to take my message in right spirit. Regards, K.Babu In , "Ramani" kadavasalramani. wrote: Dear Members of , I feel that Mr.Dhanabalan is raising several important and relevant issues for the . Instead of taking them in right spirit and having lively debate, I request members not to get them as personal insult and to attack in words. We need many more hidden treasures in the K.P. from persons like M/S Dhanabalan, M.K., Tin Win, Dr.Luther Rath, L.Y.Rao and such other knowledgeable persons. Astrologically yours, K.S.V.Ramani -- -- From: babukrcbe To: Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:19 PM Subject: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Dear Dhanabalan Ji, How many KP (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s you have done in this forum ??? I'm wondering if I have failed to read all messages in this forum. Regards, K.Babu In , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan wrote: Dear Sheetal I admit that my (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s went wrong in k.p. Why can't you put your analysis and prove yourself. In my opinion all are in my level only. Dhanabalan On Fri, 9/19/08, Sheetal ratnamalag wrote: From: Sheetal ratnamalag Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: Date: Friday, September 19, 2008, 11:53 AM Dear Dhanabalan I am reading your postings regularly and u wrote- " I have already posted 12 birth details. More than 1000 members are in this forum. No one has confident(!) to tell the date of marriage for the charts posted except Mr.Nayan. Can you tell the date of marriage for those charts." Why don't u put your analysis for your 12 charts, one by one mentioning wrong or write side of the rules? We all will try to respond your queries made in your analysis. Why you want to taste the knowledge and confidence if 1000 members? why you write such things? U don't have guts to show your analysis and always want to taste others' knowledge. Isn't it funny? Regards Dr Sheetal On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Subhash subhash_ektare wrote: Dear Mr Dhanbalan, You are welcome to dis-agree with me. It is your choice. There are many senior and experienced KP Astrologers like Mr. Raichur, Mr. Tin Win, Mr. Lajmi and Mr. Gondhalekar to name a few. When they are not accepting your challenge, there must be some reason. I am like a kid in their comparision, so question of my coming forward does not arise. In Horary, as explained by Shri KSK, moon reveals whether the question is genuine or not. If it is not, Guruji has advised not to proceed further regarding (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . Logically speaking , in Natal Charts also, if the intention of the querist is other than seeking an answer to the question (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) will be off the mark because of absence of urge. In this case your challenge is for testing the knowledge of Astrologer. So the urge for getting answer is definately missing. Naturally there won't be any urge as far as the Astrologer is concerned. So two plus two is Four. Again you are welcome to dis-agree with me. But there are my sincere views. Ragards Subhash Ekatare In gro ups, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan . wrote: Dear Subhash Ektare I do not agree your statement "Guruji KSK has come up with wonderful "Krishnamurthy Paddhati" after studying THOUSANDS (not hundreds) cases. He made rules based on his observation and study of these cases. Many senior and learned Astrologers are practicing KP now. At least in my knowledge, nobody asked him to prove his rules. They trusted it must be based on vast experience and research. Many of them shifted to KP only after practicing and experiencing better accuracy in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) ." I have already posted 12 birth details. More than 1000 members are in this forum. No one has confident to tell the date of marriage for the charts posted except Mr.Nayan. Can you tell the date of marriage for those charts. Dhanabalan On Wed, 9/17/08, Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare . wrote: From: Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare . Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: gro ups Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 2:41 PM Dear Members, Guruji KSK has come up with wonderful "Krishnamurthy Paddhati" after studying THOUSANDS (not hundreds) cases. He made rules based on his observation and study of these cases. Many senior and learned Astrologers are practicing KP now. At least in my knowledge, nobody asked him to prove his rules They trusted it must be based on vast experience and research. Many of them shifted to KP only after practicing and experiencing better accuracy in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . Similarly, there are many new theories like KB, Dr. Kar's Theory and 4 Step Theory etc. I am sure these are the results of untiring research and efforts by respective inventor. There may be some shortfalls/drawback s in each of them. There can be healthy discussion in the forum with an aim to improve, not asked to prove their respective theories. Even after giving proof through 100 cases, who is to certify it ? Where is the authority acceptable to all? Nobody has forced any member to follow certain theory. They are wise enough to choose the appropriate theory. These are my personal views. As far as 4 step Theory is concerned, I am 100% sure, Mr. Sunil Gondhalekar will welcome any constructive suggestion for improving the theory. Dr. Sheetal's observation "It is so interesting to see, whatever the topic of discussion, it cannot be completed without involvement of FOR STEP" is worth noting. Subhash Ektare -- - From: Sheetal ratnamalagg. com To: gro ups Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:35:40 PM Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Hello I am not very experienced, whatever I am writing is my understanding. 1.Though we need 100 cases to make/break the rule but when we get some finding constantly in few cases even 5-10 cases,u start getting clue that it may be the rule and start working further. And sometimes, we see even after 100 cases, established rule is not always correct.It is not the number only, but also the sincerity of the perosn who makes and breaks the rules (All knows how the data is collected for theisis and manipulations are made in drawing conclusions before submission many times!!!) 2. It is so interesting to see, whatever the topic of discussion, it can not be completed without involvement "FOUR STEP". In horary, the rule "retrograde planet or star doesnt give the result" is disproving slowly and is written by many. Also some have written that it delays the result and dosnt deny. I also feel it delays the result but with only few examples I can't claim. In four steps, it doesn't give result in transit means Mr Sunil didn't write any thing against his statement of retrograde planet not giving the result. Actually after coming to the conclusion that perticular incidence will happen in this vidasha, then we have to see the transit and if Dasha lords are transiting through retrograde star and sub (in only in 1st 2 steps) will not give the result in that perticular transit as retrograde planet has a delaying effect and so till that time it passess through another sub or star. It seem to be very simple only after understanding 4step thoroughly. Regards Dr Sheetal On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:12 PM, tw853 tw853. com wrote: Dear Friend, 1. No rule works for each and every chart. The rules are usually set on the basis of majority outcome of the charts studied. The life of each and every native is not set like in the mathematical equation. That is why we'are still far away fron near cent percent accuracy of (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . 2. Breaking a rule and making a rule are two sides of a coin. Breaking a rule is generally making a opposite rule. For instance, by saying Guruji KSK's retrogression is not working in one's experience, it is making a rule of no retrogression in horary. By saying so more obligation is to provide a proof of supporting charts. 3. If retrograde is not working in 'horary, natal and RPs', how can retrograde work in checking transit's agreement with DBA is food for thought for logical reasoning. Thanks and regards, tw In gro ups, "dubeyamitkumar" dubeyamitkumar . wrote: Respected sir I have great respect for you but here I disagree with you in this "standard requirement is 100 charts to break a rule".I beleive that even 2-3 chart is enough for this but offcourse to make a rule atleast 100 charts should be required. If rule really works then it should work in each and every chart with least exception for same type of query. With Regards AMIT In gro ups, "tw853" tw853 wrote: A KP beginner is to follow Guruji KSK till at least 50 horary charts (standard requirement is 100 charts to break a rule.) have been posted showing Guruji KSK's retrogression is not working. Shri Kuppu Ganapathi and Shri Bhatt (except in special cases) are the same as Guruji KSK. Up to now any single practical chart has not yet been posted in this regard other than here say one's experience. To break a rule deeds other than words are needed. Regards, tw In gro ups, "sunilalaka" sunilalaka wrote: dear friends, what beginners to follow? KSK/Kuppuganapati or CR Bhatt? -sunil gondhalekar In gro ups, "tw853" tw853 wrote: Dear Friends, 1. Let me put the question straight: what did Shri Hasbe write in any of his books or teach regarding retrogressionn after directly learning from Guruji KSK-- Quote- "our GREAT GURUJI has categorically stated in HIS lectures and writings that retrograde Planets do not give results if they come as Star/Sub Lords to the Significators. ." -Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi (Guidelines for Preparing and Judging a Horary Chart as per K.P. or K.P. Principles in KPEZine) (A learner direct from Guruji KSK) Unquote 2. As far as my tracing system goes, Mr. Sunil Gondhalekar has never ever said in his 4 step book or any internet discussion that his view on retrogression is Shri Hasbe's, other than saying his experience based on the application of mainly natal, rarely horary. Thanks and regards, tw In gro ups, Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare wrote: Dear Member, It is a fact that Late Shri Jyotindra Hasbe learned KP directly from Guruji KSK. He has written 4 books on KP, of course all in Marathi. Shri Sunil Gondhalekar was practicing traditional Vedic Astrology from 1970. He met Shri Hasbe Guruji during 1980 and shifted to KP. Shri Gondhalekar was Hasbe Guruji's direct disciple. So he can throw some light on views of Hasbe Guruji about retrogression. It may be brought to the notice of members that Late Shri Hasbe was to start a magazine to spread KP in Maharashtra. But due to his untimely demise he could not fulfill his dream. Shri Sunil Gondhalekar fulfilled this dream and is editing and publishing a magazine "Nakshatrache Dene", in Marathi, since Diwali 1993 till date. In every magazine he writes that this was original idea of Late Hasbe Guruji. Regards Subhash Ektare -- - From: tw853 tw853 To: gro ups Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 5:46:17 AM Subject: [] Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Dear Friends, Could any one kindly share Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression as he is from the first generation who learned directly from Guruji KSK like Shri Kuppu Ganapathi. Thanks and regards, tw
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19750
Dear Raichur Ji, TW Ji, Sathish Ji, L Y Rao Ji, Punit Ji, MK Ji and other interested members,I request you to analyse my horoscope to find when will I marry.My birth details areD.O.B : 13th August 1976P.O.B : Coimbatore, TamilnaduT.O.B : 8:49:40 AMHere is my attempt.Classic KP Method:Q: Is marriage promised per natal chart?Rule: If 7th CSL signifies 2 or 7 or 11, marriage is promisedK.P Four-fold significators===========================================================Sub's star|Sublord| Cusp  | A  | B  | C  | D===========================================================  | |  2  |  Ra | Ra | Me,Ke  | Ve===========================================================  Sa| Sa  |  7  |  --  | -- | -- | Ju===========================================================| |  11  | Ma,Ju |  | || | | Mo,Sa | Su,Sa | -- | Mo===========================================================Analysis: 7th cuspal sublord Sa which is in his own star.Both Sublord and its star lord signifies 11 (i.e saturn is A grade significator for house 11)Planets that signifies 2 or 7 or 11 are Su(B),Mo(A),Ma(A),Ra(A),Ju(A),Sa(A),Me(C),Ke(C),Ve(D). All 9 planets signify 2 or 7 or 11. 6 planets are either A or B grade significators and rest are C or D grade significators.12 to concerned house are not favorable. 12 to 7th cusp is 6 from Asc. However, I would not consider 2nd cusp in this regard, So planets signifying 12,6 are as follows6th == Mo(B&C), Sa(C)Here Sa is not strongly negating. i.e Sa signifies 11 as A&B grade compared to C grade signification to 6So, Marriage is promised.Ok. Till now it is no big deal. Marriage Timing??Ruling Planets at time of judgement:Casting Date and Time: Sunday 21 September 2008 03:56:37 PMPlace of Casting: Mars, Pennysylvania, USA (80:0:42 W,  40:41:45 N) Place is near to pittsburghLagna: Ju  Ve (SgL StL)Moon: Me  Ma (SgL StL)Day Lord is: SuNo Planets in Star of Retrograde PlanetsNo Planets in Sub of Retrograde PlanetsRahu Agent For: Mo  Sa  Ketu Agent For: Mo  Me  As Me is in RP, Ke acts as an agent for Me.So effective RP's are Ju,Ve,Me,Ma,Su,KeCommon planets in significator table and RP:All planets in RPs are significators of 2 or 7 or 11 (coz all the 9 planets signify 2 or 7 or 11)Fruitful significators: 1) Using RPs : Ju,Ve, Me, Ma, Su, Ke2) selecting the significators which are in the stars of the cusp sub lord of the concerned houses : Mo (Mo is deposited in 7th and 11th CSL Sa), Sa (Sa is deposited in own star which is 5th, 7th and 11th CSL)3) selecting the significators whose sub lords are one of the significators: Ju, Sa, Me, Ra, Ve (as all 9 planets signify 2 or 7 or 11, I have taken sublords of all planets)Summation : Ju,Ve,Me,Ma,Su,Ke (As per RP) : Mo & Sa (As per 2nd method) : Ju, Sa, Me, Ra, Ve (As per 3rd method)Negative Significators: 6th house significators == Mo(B&C), Sa(C). Here Mo is very close to 7th cusp i.e less than 1.5 degrees. Also Mo is in Star and Sublord of 7th CSL. So Mo very well signifies 7th cusp and it is in star of Sa which strongly signifies 11th cusp. So, I would like to reject Mo as strong negator to 7th. Sa also I would like to reject as it is strong significator of 11th house & cuspEffective Fruitful Significators: Ju,Ve,Me,Ma,Su,Ke (as per RP), Sa (as strong significator of 11) & Ra (as per 3rd method and also A significator of 2nd house). Only Mo is left out.Q: When will marriage fructify?Timing Event:Year: Ju is in Ve & Su star till 21st Jan 2009. After that Mo star which we are not considering.Month: Su will be in stars other than Mo in almost all through the way as all 8 planets are fruitful significatorsDay : Mo will be in stars other than Mo in almost all through the way as all 8 planets are fruitful significatorsD.B.A = Me-Ju-Mo (20th Aug 2008 to 28th Oct 2008) - No Me-Ju-Ma (28th Oct 2008 to 15th Dec 2008) - Yes (I believe this is most effective as Ma is Yogi planet and it is in 11th in navamsa. Pardon me to deviate from KP rules. Just that I want to use all systems to fortify my prognosis. I'm fond of Sheshadri Iyer's divisional chart reading method. Iyer and Guruji KSK were contemporaries and both were of same philosophy on star lord's role in astrology until KSK invented sub lord theory) Me-Ju-Ra (15th Dec 2008 to 18th Apr 2009) - YesConclusion: There is a chance to get marry every day 4 Step Theory:Planet: Ket Occ: 8 (Asp: 2 Asp: Ra  Asp.By: Sa  Ra  ){SgL: Ma  Occ: 12[P]  Owns: 3[P](e) 8 }It's STAR LORD: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) It's SUB LORD: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) SUB's STAR LORD: Ket Occ: 8 (Asp: 2 Asp: Ra  Asp.By: Sa  Ra  ){SgL: Ma  Occ: 12[P]  Owns: 3[P](e) 8 }Effectively Ke : 12,2,9Planet: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) It's STAR LORD: Ket Occ: 8 (Asp: 2 Asp: Ra  Asp.By: Sa  Ra  ){SgL: Ma  Occ: 12[P]  Owns: 3[P](e) 8 }It's SUB LORD: Mer  Occ: 12  Owns: 1(e) 10(e) SUB's STAR LORD: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) Effectively Ve : 8,12,2,9Planet: Sun  Occ: 11  Owns: 12 It's STAR LORD: Mer  Occ: 12  Owns: 1(e) 10(e) It's SUB LORD: Jup  Occ: 8[P]  Owns: 4[P](e) 7[P](e) (Conj: 9  )SUB's STAR LORD: Sun  Occ: 11  Owns: 12 Effectively Su : 12,1,10,8,9,4,7,11Planet: Moo  Occ: 6[P]  Owns: 11 (Conj: 7  )It's STAR LORD: Sat  Occ: 11[P]  Owns: 5[P](e) 6 It's SUB LORD: Sat  Occ: 11[P]  Owns: 5[P](e) 6 SUB's STAR LORD: Sat  Occ: 11[P]  Owns: 5[P](e) 6 Effectively Mo : 6,11,7,5Planet: Mar  Occ: 12[P]  Owns: 3[P](e) 8 It's STAR LORD: Sun  Occ: 11  Owns: 12 It's SUB LORD: Rah Occ: 2 (Asp: 8 Asp: Ke  Asp.By: Ke  ){SgL: Ve  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) }SUB's STAR LORD: Rah Occ: 2 (Asp: 8 Asp: Ke  Asp.By: Ke  ){SgL: Ve  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) }Effectively Ma : 6,11,7,5Planet: Rah Occ: 2 (Asp: 8 Asp: Ke  Asp.By: Ke  ){SgL: Ve  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) }It's STAR LORD: Rah Occ: 2 (Asp: 8 Asp: Ke  Asp.By: Ke  ){SgL: Ve  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) }It's SUB LORD: Mer  Occ: 12  Owns: 1(e) 10(e) SUB's STAR LORD: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) Effectively Ra : 2,12,2,9Planet: Jup  Occ: 8[P]  Owns: 4[P](e) 7[P](e) (Conj: 9  )It's STAR LORD: Sun  Occ: 11  Owns: 12 It's SUB LORD: Mer  Occ: 12  Owns: 1(e) 10(e) SUB's STAR LORD: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) Effectively Ju : 8,9,4,7,11,12,2Planet: Sat  Occ: 11[P]  Owns: 5[P](e) 6 It's STAR LORD: Sat  Occ: 11[P]  Owns: 5[P](e) 6 It's SUB LORD: Jup  Occ: 8[P]  Owns: 4[P](e) 7[P](e) (Conj: 9  )SUB's STAR LORD: Sun  Occ: 11  Owns: 12 Effectively Sa : 11,5,6,8,9,4,7,12Planet: Mer  Occ: 12  Owns: 1(e) 10(e) It's STAR LORD: Ven  Occ: 12  Owns: 2 9(e) It's SUB LORD: Jup  Occ: 8[P]  Owns: 4[P](e) 7[P](e) (Conj: 9  )SUB's STAR LORD: Sun  Occ: 11  Owns: 12 Effectively Me : 12,2,9,8,9,4,7,11Q: Is marriage promised?A: 7th CSL Sa signifies 11,5 in 1st & 2nd step and 11th in 4th step and hence marriage is promised.Planets signification pertaining to 2,7,11. We leave -ve house signification in 4 stepKe = 2Ve = 2Su = 7,11Mo = 7,11Ma = 7,11Ra = 2Ju = 7,11Sa = 7,11Me = 2,7,11Again all 9 planets signify 2 or 7 or 11.Q: When will marriage fructify?Rule: The event will fructify only when the DBA lords are jointly the primary significators of all the required houses (2, 7, 11 for marriage), signifying at least one different house each by DBA. Timing Event:D.B.A = Me-Ju-Mo (20th Aug 2008 to 28th Oct 2008) - Yes (Me-2,7,11 : Ju-7,11 :  Mo-7,11)  Me-Ju-Ma (28th Oct 2008 to 15th Dec 2008) - Yes (Me-2,7,11 : Ju-7,11 :  Ma-7,11)  Me-Ju-Ra (15th Dec 2008 to 18th Apr 2009) - Yes (Me-2,7,11 : Ju-7,11 :  Ra-2)Conclusion: Again, There is a chance to get marry every day  Request: Although the classic KP method and 4 step suggests that chances to get marry is almost every day in reality this is not happening. Marriage has not happened till now coz I my brother marriage was delayed one and it just happened in July 2008. Also I have punarphoo and it cannot delay further from here as I have crossed 32 year mark. I request members to analyse my approach of the methods discussed above and guide me if I have made any mistake. Secondly and more importantly, can you provide me likely dates for marriage? In my humble opinion, horary comes to rescue in these cases, I believe. I'm not an expert in any system and Horary is never my cup of tea. I request the seniors to help me in this.Here is my question: When will I marry?Horary Number : 31I would like to know the following1) When will I marry?2) May I know her characteristics?3) Will she be working and in that case what could be her field of profession?Here are some of my details just in case if you want to verifyPhysical Appearence: Looks young than age. I attribute this to Me who is sublord of Asc. Many say I look like 26-27 although I'm 32 now. Affected by residual polio paralysis (left leg, very mild) when I was 2 year old but can do things everyday activity normally and can drive 2 wheeler and 4 wheeler very well. On a lighter note, I drive 4 wheeler like Michael Schumaker and so my friends call me Mysore Schumaker :) (when I was in Mysore, Karnataka)Education: B.E Mechanical Engineer (1993-1997), M.E Engineering Design(1997-1999)Occupation: Mechanical Engineer (2000-2001) Software Engineer (2001 - till date) Thanks for reading such a long story of mine.Regards,K.BabuNotes:1) I have used Jothish Deepika for casting chart with KP New Ayanamsa2) 6,8,12th houses are unfavorable to house in question. Hence 6th, 12th and 2th house from Asc are unfavorable. However 2nd house cannot be considered as unfavorable as 2nd house itself is one of supporting house for mariage. 8th house to 7th house can cause obstacles but cannot deny. So only 12th house to 7th house can deny marriage i.e 6th house signification is detrimental to marriage. Thatz why I have used only 6th house for negation in above analysis. I could be wrong in this. I request learned scholars to guide me.3) I have referred TW Ji's article "Differences between KP and Four Step Method by Tin Win in ASTROVISION, July 2008" from files section. I cannot express in words how much this kind of summary articles have been helpful. KP community is greatly indebted to TW Ji for his compilation and analysis.4) Thanks to Gondalekar Ji for his 4 step contribution5) Birth Time is verified by MK's rule. Thanks to MK Ji for sharing this rule.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19751
Dear Sundar ji, I am no expert on Kp, but you dont need an expert to do this.   First of all why do you need to consult two people from 2 continents at the same time ? That would be absurd. Secondly why do you need anyone at all, if you know this much about Ruling planets.   Out of curiosity I just checked the RP's now at Bombay 22nd September. Time is 13.15.22  ( jagannath Hora software used ).   I get Sagittarius rising. Moon in Rahu star.  Moon in Raashi of Mercury. Day is Monday Asc. star is ketu.   If You look further than asc.SL is jupiter.   Saturn does not appear anywhere.   Try to rectify your time keeping Pisces asc. as base in mind, and verify the events as per dashas running alongwith the significators of the dasha Lords.   I am myself born near your birthplace at  Eluru in same month and year on June 28th 1961 I did my rectification myself and compared it with experts verdict afterwards. You must try the same.   regards, Bhaskar.  shrikrishnajyotish         In , "sundar190561" sundar190561. wrote: In my case, the asc is exactly on the cusp between Aquarius & Pisces. A change in timing of 2 to 4 minutes will take the ascendant from Aquarius to Pisces and due to this the house lordships will urdergo a change. Secondly, if two persons take up the rectification by "ruling planets" from two diametrically opposite continents, the ruling planets will also be different. In such a case how does one go about rectification of chart. I have given my birth details below: DOB: 22nd June, 1961 TOB: 23:38 (IST) POB: Bhimavaram, AP, Lat:16N32, Long:81E32 Could any of the experts throw light on this.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19752
Dear RG, TOB was in fact 11-45 AM. There was a type mistake. Sorry for the samedly review the other aspects of the proceedure and comment. Another message has come in to the forum to predict from horary number. Kindly try that also. He has proposed to consider some other houses. With regards. Dr. Luther -- -From: Ravinder Grover rgrover.To: Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 6:03:50 AMSubject: RE: [] querry about win in election by a neutarl person , which house to be judged? 22 Sep 2008   Dear Sir   Is your TIME OF BIRTH is correct? You have given 11:45 pm   Regards   RG   From: gro ups [to:k_p_ systemgrou ps] On Behalf Of Luther RathSent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 2:55 PMTo: gro upsSubject: Re: [] querry about win in election by a neutarl person , which house to be judged?   Dear Sir, Please see the attachment for an example. Kindly reply after studying the detail. With regards. Dr. Luther   -- -From: alokshriv1 alokshriv1. co.ukTo: gro upsSent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:58:43 AMSubject: [] querry about win in election by a neutarl person , which house to be judged? Respected KP stalwarts, if a neutral person who is neither interested in a party or a candidate and asks about outcome of election then what house should be considered as a principal house of reference? Many times such querries come from neutral persons those are not bothered about outcome and only want to know just out of curosity or otherwise hidden reason, in such circumstances , to find principal house of reference is a tricky thing. Can such questions be answered in your opinion !  
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19753
Dear murali Please try with kp , as i am little busy with my Electri Automobile research work. Sahhasra Saagara On Mon, 22/9/08, Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. wrote: From: Murali Krishna muralibkrishna.Subject: Re: Lot of issues in my life - Please guide meTo: ssagar86.Date: Monday, 22 September, 2008, 1:32 AMDear Sagarji, Please advice me on my marriage. Regards, Murali On Thu, 9/11/08, Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. wrote: From: Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. Subject: Re: Lot of issues in my life - Please guide me To: ssagar86. Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 11:13 AM Respected Sagarji, You told me to give me a number after September 10 to check on my re-marriage after my divorce. Number : 190 With Respects, Murali On Thu, 8/21/08, Sagar S ssagar86. wrote: From: Sagar S ssagar86. Subject: Re: Lot of issues in my life - Please guide me To: muralibkrishna. Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008, 5:44 AM Hi As per H.No.247 lagna (Read: Lagna LAGN Batata Hai by S.M.Pinaki) will be Pisces and mercury the 7th lord in the 6th donotes divorce. Mars in the 6th cusp.Moon lord of 5th in the lagna (Read: Lagna LAGN Batata Hai by S.M.Pinaki) signifies 5th again. ur Marrital matter may not be fruitful Plz. give me a new number after 10th September 2008. So i can check any fruitful result regarding marrital matter. Sahhsra Saagara On Thu, 21/8/08, Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. wrote: From: Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. Subject: Re: Lot of issues in my life - Please guide me To: ssagar86. Date: Thursday, 21 August, 2008, 2:30 AM Respected Sagarji, When will I get married again? I am going through a painful divorce. My wife and her parents cheated us. Number : 247 With Respect, Murali On Wed, 8/20/08, Sagar S ssagar86. wrote: From: Sagar S ssagar86. Subject: Re: Lot of issues in my life - Please guide me To: muralibkrishna. Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008, 1:25 PM Hi What exact problem u have? give me a number between 1-249 with ur any one important question Make use of Vastu shilpa shastra-Mirrorology starteller/estart9.html Sahhasra Saagara On Wed, 20/8/08, Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. wrote: From: Murali Krishna muralibkrishna. Subject: Lot of issues in my life - Please guide me To: ssagar86. Date: Wednesday, 20 August, 2008, 5:53 PM Respected Sagarji, I got your e id from . Would you please guide me about my life. Please find my details below. Name : Murali krishna Date of Birth : June 15th 1975 Place of Birth : Guntur Time of Birth : 8.07 pm With Respects, Murali Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more! Go to in.movies./ Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Go to in.web./ Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading . Click here
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19754
On Sun, 21/9/08, balaji balu_yourslovingly. wrote:From: balaji balu_yourslovingly.Subject: Re: [] when will i get a jobTo: Date: Sunday, 21 September, 2008, 8:53 AMdear sudhir ji,my birth details18-9-19847- 43 amLatitude: 13° 11' -1" N Longitude: 79° 38' -1" Eplace : tiruttani On Fri, 19/9/08, Sudhir taurus.sudhir. wrote:From: Sudhir taurus.sudhir.Subject: Re: [] when will i get a jobTo: Date: Friday, 19 September, 2008, 8:54 PM Hello Balaji:   Post birth details   Regards Sudhir  On 9/19/08, balaji.VS balu_yourslovingly .co. in wrote: dear members.i am balaji doing M.tech in Chennai. Coming December job recruitmentgoing to start in my collage. i am not so confident for the interview.and also i am having very low marks in my previous semesters. please tell me when will i get a job?my no : 76if u can tell a solution it'll be a great helpful to me,thanks in advance,yoursbalaji vs. -- Sudhir Consulting Astrologer Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading . Click here
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19755
Dear Rao Chitturu   I am not bothering about your adverse comment against me. Being a teacher and counseller, instead of giving adverse comments, I request you to participate in the discussion. In K.P., the exaltation is not considered. I am justifying it.   The following two charts are belongs to husband and wife. Though the father's karaka planet sun is in exaltation, their fathers died in the childhood.   X(Husband) Date of birth 9-5-1959 at 7.08 AM in Salem Taurus lagna (Read: Lagna LAGN Batata Hai by S.M.Pinaki) 12 degrees; Sun at 24 degree in Aries (exaltation) Father died before the birth of the native. Karaka for father Sun is exaltation     Y (Wife) Date of birth 3-5-1970 at 9.01 AM in Salem Gemini lagna (Read: Lagna LAGN Batata Hai by S.M.Pinaki) 3.30’ degrees; Sun at 19 degree in Aries (exaltation) Father died within one year after the birth of the native. Karaka for father Sun is exaltation     Generally, the planets in the first 5 degree (infant) of any sign will not give results. Likewise the planets in the last 5 degree(old age) of any sign will not give results. It is a general rule in vedic. It is strictly followed in “s Approach” by V.K.Chouthry. All the planets moolatrikona house is one of its own sign. In the approach method, only the Moolatrigona sign is considered and not the exaltation.   But the Moon is exalted at 3 degree at Taurus and Venus is exalted at 27 degree in Pisces. There is contravesy to the above. I think it is a justification for not considering the exaltation and debilitation in K.P. In the Naadi system, if the exalted planet is in between enemies(bhava kathari yoga), it loses its power of exaltation.   If you feel that you are expert, tell me the date of marriage for the above couple. These two charts are not covered in the 12 charts already posted. Dhanabalan On Sat, 9/20/08, rao chitturu csr162002. wrote: From: rao chitturu csr162002.Subject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: Date: Saturday, September 20, 2008, 11:09 PM Dear Dhanabalam, Your statement that 'Astrolgers are also astronomers" is not always correct. We are , still, learners in both the fields.We have as astrolgers have gone a bit more with an understanding of astronomival base. You can at any time compare different systems - but there is a way to compare. You are getting yourself confused in bascs and are also propmted by your anxiety to prolong discussions - You have no knowledge of the atronomical basis for arriving at exaltation points  exaltations. You are refering to the Placidous system of bhava division witj out understanding the duration of a star in both systems. For instance, the duration of each star is not uniform in hindu system - but in westrn system all stars are of equal duration of 13deg 29 mts. You refer to Hindu panchang - the suration of a star is not uniformly 24 hrs . You have also no knowledge of the princple of Ayanamsa - It is always changing. You know it only as a difference between Sayana and Nirayana - But how it formed and calculated is - on the basis of earth's rotation and revolution - and a third principle of shifting of earth's axis. It appears that you lack a "Guru" or a suitable "Guru" to put your studies in an order. You do get a benefit when you learn from a good guru directly - besides reading standard books- Pl.understand that -you are refering to fundamentals of the systems - I do not mind writing on such matters - for the benefit all beginners - but sometimes I may not be able to go in details for want of time - So do not get disturbed , hereafter, if I cannot concentrate to reply your qurries. I suggest you get in touch of a good guru for better understanding of fundamentals before comparing the systems - I do not want to discourage - You should continue your studies - but in anorder. rao chitturu astrologer teaching & counselling. On Sat, 20/9/08, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan wrote: From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan Subject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Saturday, 20 September, 2008, 8:25 PM Dear Rao Exaltation based on vedic differ from exaltation based on western. Placidous system with bhava begin is western method. But we are following in k.p. system. K.p. is amalgamation of vedic and western. Hence there is a necessity to compare the exaltation in both the system.   Which exaltation is correct. Whether vedic is correct or western is correct is the question. Astrologers are also astronomers. So we can discuss.   Dhanabalan On Fri, 9/19/08, rao chitturu csr162002. com wrote: From: rao chitturu csr162002. comSubject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Friday, September 19, 2008, 1:40 PM Dear Dhanabalan. Arohana and avrohana positions are used in arriving at Ishta bala and kashtabala of lanets. Sayana and Nirayana positions need not be tallied to compare the exaltation positions - And the comaprision of Vedic and Western points of exaltation  - is an exercise of Astronomy- It involves lot of maths whcich can be followed only by Astronomers - Comparing that way is not correct in my view- Rao chitttru. On Fri, 19/9/08, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan com wrote: From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan Subject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Friday, 19 September, 2008, 4:23 PM Dear Rao Chitturu   I have studied about the exaltation in vedic astrology. I accept that it is used to calculate shad bala. Further there is aroganam and avaroganam. . . .   The difference between sayana system and nirayana system is about 23 degrees. This 23 degree difference is not maintained for the exaltation point in vedic and wstern system. Please compare the exaltation point of all the planets in vedic and western system and give your comments.   Dhanabalan  On Fri, 9/19/08, rao chitturu csr162002. com wrote: From: rao chitturu csr162002. comSubject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Friday, September 19, 2008, 10:06 AM Dear Dhanabalan, With due regards for your devotion to the subject, I am surprised to hear from you that you are able to see the "scientific explanation" for combustion and not for exaltation, debilitation. I am unable to know your meaning of "SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION" I do not mean to hurt you. If you go through the traditional books and the purpose of Shadbala, Avasthas etc., to know the positional strength -- you will appreciate the Astronomical background behind reading a chart. At many places they are referred and lot of importance is given for such positions in predictive astrology. While reading the standard traditional books I prefer to read with a presumption that they are all well proved and written by standard authors like PARASARA ETC., even KP system is based on Hindu traditional astrology. KP system can be simply described as a Hindu system blended with principles of western astrology. the advent of KP system cannot rule out the tradiional system - KP system can also described as "Nakshtra Navamsa" by standard authors. Comming to combustion effect distance of ORB is mentioned to know the effect of combustion with different planets. Regarding Combustion of Sun and Mercury - as Mercury is in the next orbit  of Sun it has a good resistance - and the combination of Sun and Mercury in Gemini,Leo and Virgo described as a Good Yoga - Budhaditya Yoga - the bad rapt conjunction of Mercury and Sun is likely to cause forgetfullness- The effect of each planet is to be seen on the merits of individual planets. Comming to predictive part of astrology - one must rember - at any given time the native gets a 'package deal' of all planets with a leadership of one or more planets depending on their transit or dasa, bhukti etc, positions. Mathematical calculationsa nd accuracy are very essential bad not to the extent of erroding predictive skills of the astrologer. Predictive skills are purely personal and are very timely. Still practice makes one perfect in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s - Yet the accuracy of (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s are the luck of bothe the native and the astrologer (Consult Indian Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) of that time.  mathematical formulae cannot solely give predictive skills. rao chitturu     On Thu, 18/9/08, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan com wrote: From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan Subject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Thursday, 18 September, 2008, 5:37 PM Dear Rao Chitturu   Is there any scientific explanation for exaltation and debilitation. I do not think any scientific justification for exaltation. I have tried to find out the scientic explanation but I could not succeed.   But there is some scientific explanation for combustion. Rapt conjunction of sun and venus has its own effect. No one can deny this. Mr.KSK said that there is no combustion effect for mercury. I have read in some other vedic books that there is no combustion effect for Venus and Saturn.   I accept that we should not neglect exaltation and combustion. It needs deep study.    Dhanabalan On Thu, 9/18/08, rao chitturu csr162002. com wrote: From: rao chitturu csr162002. comSubject: Re: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Thursday, September 18, 2008, 6:42 AM Respected Dr.Luther, Sir, Cobustion, exaltation etc., are not considered in KP - to my knowledge . . . . . May be the researchers in KP, out of their personal experienceses might have added some observation. Then it is to be seen on the merits of individual charts- because the observations of experiensed cannot be easily ruled out.  In traditional theories they are taken among other considerations for predictive puposes. Traditional theories need long discussions - so I cannot discuss in this forum.Any standard book on hindu traditional system deal with this. rao chitturu. On Wed, 17/9/08, Luther Rath rathluther. com wrote: From: Luther Rath rathluther. comSubject: [] Combustion of planetsTo: gro upsDate: Wednesday, 17 September, 2008, 11:26 AM Respected Rao Chitturu Sir,1. ‘Vikala’ is one of the states of existence, ‘Avastha’ of planets out of ten. This avastha indicates loss of wife and children, disgrace, disease etc according to tradition. ‘Vikala’ is translated as ‘combustion’. What does actually combustion mean in astrology? In other words what does ‘Vikala’ mean?2. It is mentioned that different planets have different orbs for application of combustion. For example Saturn has an orb of 15 degrees from Sun. During August and September this year Saturn remains in this zone for about 35 days [Sun (-) 15 to Sun (+) 15]. Does it mean that Saturn is combust for all these 35 days? In case of Moon it comes to about 2 days in combustion every month. The period of combustion for other planets varies accordingly.3. What should be our reading for combust planets in KP?With regards.Dr. Luther Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. Add more friends to your and enjoy! Invite them now. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19756
Dear Ramani   Please give the time of events like marriage, child birth date and some other events. I will send the progression charts for 4 events through one . Then we will analyse the charts.   I do not have the copy of A&A for the year 1999. You can apply that principle in your chart and explain to the members. I can send you any number of progression charts if you give the details.   Dhanabalan On Sun, 9/21/08, Ramani kadavasalramani. wrote: From: Ramani kadavasalramani.Subject: [] ProgressionTo: Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008, 4:40 AM Dear Sri Dhanabalan R,   This refers to my query and discussions about Progression with ref. to VMDBA.  In this connection, I would like to draw your attention and also of members, a fine article on Progression by late Sri KMS in K.P.& Astrology Annual 1999, wherein he has discussed about the utility of the Progressed chart.  Thanks for your model chart furnished to me.   Thanking you once again, Astrologically yours, K.S.V.Ramani
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19757
Dear Sir,Pardon me for the delay, please. Congrats!  You got it right!By Rule 1 - Verification by Ruling Planets is absolutely correct.I am happy that someone can try out my method and get convinced.By Rule 2 - It is O.K. again. That's it. Ascendant connected with Moon in some way.By Rule 3 - Is the father's Birth Moon Starlord "Kethu". Sorry, I do not go for this connection as such. ( As the Secretary of our association "Prof.A.Vaithialingam Astrological Research Society - PAVARS", for the last two days, I was quite busy with my routine work towards arrangements for our Monthly Seminar, which is held on every third Sunday.  So the delay in replying to you.) With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025-- -From: Sunaparantha Kalyan sunaparantha.To: Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:48:19 PMSubject: Fw: [] Quarry on BTR Sorry, Inadvertently I have mixed up an unwanted part of a message with the following , which is appeared under my signature. Pl. do erase it and read. Sorry for the inconvenience caused.- Sunaparantha-- Forwarded Message -From: Sunaparantha Kalyan sunaparantha To: gro upsSent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:37:34 PMSubject: Re: [] Quarry on BTR Dear MKji First of all I wish to convey my sincere thanks for yr generosity, granted to me and all students, who are in thirsty to have a better knowledge in KP. Further, I am lucky to have a chance to write to a scholar, when I am in need assistance, as U allowed me in Yr last . Now, herewith I forward the detail of verification of TOB, which is in my first to the forum. TOB as given by the hospital is 22.04.00 Hrs on 06.07.2008 Long.80.06  Lat.07.07 SW used JHL Ver. 7.02 Ayanamsa : for Birth 23-53-36.55 For RP  23-53-47.62   1. Verifying with RP Date of judgment - 18.09.2008 at 21.41.19 Hrs  Long. 80.03  Lat.  07.09 Result of my judgment   Comparison : Asc with RP Moon's position: Sg.L  St.L Sub  SS  SSS Asc. Sa  Ra  Ve  Ke Ma RP Moon Ma Ve  Ve  Me Ke   Results: Match 1. Asc. Ve + RP Moon's Ve 2. Asc. Ma + RP Moon's Ma 3. Asc. Ke + RP Moon's Ke   3 out of 5   Conjunction - Nil   Aspects -   In the Asc. Ra. is in Cp. 26.30.39 in aspect of Me. in Ge. 00.15.10 at the 8th aspect of Me Hence another I out of 5 is OK Sat in the Asc. is left as it doesn¢t match with RP Moon   Total result is 4 out of 5   2. According to the rule " If the Asc Sublord is the same as Moon's Starlord, or Sublord or SSlord or SSSlord, then the given time can be taken as the correct one".   Here in this Natal chart, Asc Sub Ld is Ve, and Ve is SSS Ld of birth Moon. Hence it agrees with the above rule.   3. According to the 9th Cusp rule, ie; "Birth Lagna Cusp Sub Lord, should tell the Birth Star" Here in this Natal chart, 9th cusp Sub Ld is Sat., who is in the Star of Ke   My Conclusion : In the verification with RP it scored 4 out of 5 Other two rules of KP too are completed. As U said, it is not wise to go far away by neglecting the given TOB and according to my view and knowledge, there won't be any rectification for the given TOB.   Please thoroughly check my analyzing and verification method, I have followed. My correctness of the same  will be a great guidance for my astrological future.   Om Tat Sat Sunaparantha           Result:   Sat + Sat of (A) Asc matches with RP Moon's Sat + Sat =  1 out of 5 is ok. By Conjunction Ven of (A) Asc matches with RP Moon's Mar + Mar =  1 out of 5 is ok. By 120 deg aspect  Rah of (A) Asc matches with RP Moon's Mar + Mar  =  1 out of 5 is ok. Left out Sun of (A) Asc doesn't match with RP Moon.  So, Asc (A)'s total score is  =  4 out of 5.     -- -From: Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology To: gro upsSent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:35:32 PMSubject: Re: [] Quarry on BTR Dear Sunaparantha,Thank you very much for the response.Please don't call me 'Guruji'. I am not such a great scholar. Just call me 'MK Ji', if you like it.Pl don't hesitate to ask anything. I shall help you all with what I know so far.Thanks again for the good wishes and the prayer.I extend the same to you. GOD BLESS YOU.With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025-- -From: Sunaparantha Kalyan sunaparantha To: gro upsSent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:02:38 PMSubject: Re: [] Quarry on BTR Dear MK GurujiI agree with yr opinion cent per cent, as I also hesitated to accept the TOB difference of 9 Min. as well as the parents of that baby. So far I have not come across any crystal clear method of verification or rectification. As such I obeyed to the rule what I have mention. Nowadays I am analyzing my son's Chart according to different rules, as I see in the forumand wish to post to the forum.Further I make this opportunity to graeatful thanks to U and all other Seniors, who participated for my quarry.May Guru Brihaspatihe bless you all.Sunaparantha-- -From: Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology To: gro upsSent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:48:46 AMSubject: Re: [] Quarry on BTR Dear Sunaparantha, You have done a good analysis from the given rules as perceived by you. Well done.May I give my opinion?Recorded Time of Birth in the Hospital is 22.04 Hrs, whereas you have arrived at  a Time that is 9 minutes lesser. Do you think that the hospital people would have noted the time only after 9 minutes of cutting the empirical cord, followed by the first cry (breath) of the child?For the sake of the astrological derivations or understanding we have in our hands, we need not go that far.  The concept or idea given by Shri MPS in "Astro-Secrets and KP - Part 2", is that:If the Asc Sublord appearing for the given time is the same as Moon's Signlord or more precisely Moon's Starlord, then the given time can be taken as the Correct Birth Time.To check this, consider the below four steps, as given in the above said book:1. Birth Moon's Starlord (or Signlord) = Birth Asc's Sublord (A)2. Birth Moon's Starlord (or Signlord) = Sublord of Birth Asc's Sublord (B)3. Birth Moon's Starlord (or Signlord) = SubSubSub Lord of above (A).4. Birth Moon's Starlord (or Signlord) = SubSubSub Lord of above (B).If any one of these conditions suits well, then the given time is okay. No need of correction at Sublord level.  Keeping this Sublord assumed as the correct, when you try fix the Asc more precisely by putting in the SubSub Lord and the SubSubSub Lord also, then the given time is likely to oscillate between some 2 to 3 minutes + or -.  (You need to do this with the help of the RPs at the time of anlysis.)That is all.9 minutes of difference derived from a standard formula in hand, without checking the correctness of the given time, I feel it is too much. Logical reasoning on this is: "When twin births happening within a difference of five minutes can make a lot of difference in their destiny and real life, why to go for a 9 minute difference just for the sake of a formula in our hands?It should not be as we think it should be.  It is to be seen as it is and accept the nature's indication.You may go through my other explanations under message heading, "BTR by a student,rbt-Introducing MK Rule Birth Time Verification" , etcThe concept should be "Verfication of Birth Time" and we should not go straight away to "Rectification of Birth Time", which can mean we have to change all given birth time for the sake of a particular rule we have perceived in our minds.I beg the pardon of all seniors if my above words are not so good.  I mean no harm to anybody. It is just a humble opinion of mine.I await response from others in this regard.With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025-- -From: Sunaparantha Kalyan sunaparantha To: gro upsSent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:46:46 PMSubject: [] Quarry on BTR Pranam to All,For the attention of the Senior Members,Being a KP student, I set a side and going through all the discussion apper in the forum.By doing some practicals, I have mostly attended for BTR according to the KP Guruji Sri KSK.Now I have found another problem on deciding the exat TOB on BTR.Here I explain it through a BTR.Native - a female babyDOB - 06.07.2008TOB - 22 Hrs 04 Min. ( Given by the Hospital Authorities)POB - Wathupitiwela- Sri Lanka Lat.07.03 Long. 80.07SW used - Jagannatha Hora Ver 7.02Ayanamasa - 23 - 53 - 36.55According to the KP rule for BTR,"if the sublord and the sub-sublord of the Ascendant apear as the starlord and sublord occupied by the  MOON,the TOB given or arrived at by adjustment,is the EXACT TOB.upto the second.".In the above TOB, Asc & Moon are not tally with the rule as above.Hence I adjusted the TOB, to appear the rule.Ke. as Asc sub lord and Ju as Asc sub sub lord, appear as the Moon's St. Lord and Sub Lord respectively,at 21 Hrs 55 Min 08 Sec. and it extended up to 21 Hrs 55 Min 29 Sec.My 1st quarry is - What should be the exact TOB in this time range?Keeping this puzzle in the mind, I peeped into the second rule  as in Astro Secrets Part 2, page 81,"Birth Lagna Cusp Sub Lord, should tell the Birth Star"and"The Birth Lagna Sub in which Sub it is- that Sub will be in Star-Sub - Sub Sub-Sub Sub Sub."In the time range as above, (a) at 21. 55. 08 Hrs, 9th Cusp  Sub Sub Lord is Me, who appears as the Star Lord of Ke, the Sub of Asc.(b) at 21. 55 . 21 Hrs, Sat appears as Sub Sub Sub Lord of the 9th Cusp, who is in the Star of Ke.According my understanding, the most correct TOB is 21.55.08 as (a) above.My 2nd quarry is - Am I correct?No any important life events of this baby so far My earnest request to the member is to go through the both quarry and eliminate themost suitable path to follow.I wish to make this opportunity to thank Guruji Dr.Luthar, Guruji LYRao,Guruji SS, Guruji KSVRaman and all others, who attended to my very first trial and advced on the subject, appeared in the forum as "BTR by a KP student" Thanks and Good LuckSunaparantha
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19758
Dear Sagar Child birth is a past event. For the birth time rectification, we are taking  present R.P. If one is able to predict the past events, he can predict the future events also. If one is not able to predict the past events, he can not predict the future events also.   Dhanabalan On Sat, 9/20/08, Sagar S ssagar86. wrote: From: Sagar S ssagar86.Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogressionTo: Date: Saturday, September 20, 2008, 6:56 PM Hi As per my knowledge astrological (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s will be for the future events and post mortem will be only when our (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s fails.And more over astrology is not a challenging subject it is a examination paper for every astrologer, every individual horoscope is a new examination paper. Though i got succeeded in so many (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s on Marrige i dint take up the 12 chatrts given by Mr.Dhanabala, and I also asked one member Mostly Mr.Nayan, to take it as a research work. Sahhasra Saagara On Sat, 20/9/08, babukrcbe babukrcbe. com wrote: From: babukrcbe babukrcbe. comSubject: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogressionTo: gro upsDate: Saturday, 20 September, 2008, 10:19 PM Dear Dhanabalan Ji,How many KP (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s you have done in this forum ??? I'm wondering if I have failed to read all messages in this forum.Regards,K.Babu In gro ups, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan . wrote: Dear Sheetal I admit that my (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s went wrong in k.p. Why can't you put your analysis and prove yourself. In my opinion all are in my level only.    Dhanabalan On Fri, 9/19/08, Sheetal ratnamalag . wrote: From: Sheetal ratnamalag . Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: gro ups Date: Friday, September 19, 2008, 11:53 AM Dear Dhanabalan   I am reading your postings regularly and u wrote-   " I have already posted 12 birth details. More than 1000 members are in this forum. No one has confident(!) to tell the date of marriage for the charts posted except Mr.Nayan. Can you tell the date of marriage for those charts."   Why don't u put your analysis for your 12 charts, one by one mentioning wrong or write side of the rules? We all will try to respond your  queries made in your analysis. Why you want to taste the knowledge and confidence if 1000 members? why you write such things? U don't have guts to show your analysis and always want to taste others' knowledge. Isn' t it funny?   Regards Dr Sheetal       On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Subhash subhash_ektare wrote: Dear Mr Dhanbalan, You are welcome to dis-agree with me. It is your choice. There are many senior and experienced KP Astrologers like Mr. Raichur, Mr. Tin Win, Mr. Lajmi and Mr. Gondhalekar to name a few. When they are not accepting your challenge, there must be some reason. I am like a kid in their comparision, so question of my coming forward does not arise. In Horary, as explained by Shri KSK, moon reveals whether the question is genuine or not. If it is not, Guruji has advised not to proceed further regarding (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . Logically speaking , in Natal Charts also, if the intention of the querist is other than seeking an answer to the question (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) will be off the mark because of absence of urge. In this case your challenge is for testing the knowledge of Astrologer. So the urge for getting answer is definately missing. Naturally there won't be any urge as far as the Astrologer is concerned. So two plus two is Four. Again you are welcome to dis-agree with me. But there are my sincere views. Ragards Subhash Ekatare In gro ups, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan . wrote: Dear Subhash Ektare I do not agree your statement "Guruji KSK has come up with wonderful "Krishnamurthy Paddhati" after studying THOUSANDS (not hundreds) cases. He made rules based on his observation and study of these cases. Many senior and learned Astrologers are practicing KP now. At least in my knowledge, nobody asked him to prove his rules. They trusted it must be based on vast experience and research. Many of them shifted to KP only after practicing and experiencing better accuracy in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) ." I have already posted 12 birth details. More than 1000 members are in this forum. No one has confident to tell the date of marriage for the charts posted except Mr.Nayan. Can you tell the date of marriage for those charts. Dhanabalan On Wed, 9/17/08, Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare . wrote: From: Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare . Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression To: gro ups Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 2:41 PM Dear Members, Guruji KSK has come up with wonderful "Krishnamurthy Paddhati" after studying THOUSANDS (not hundreds) cases. He made rules based on his observation and study of these cases. Many senior and learned Astrologers are practicing KP now. At least in my knowledge, nobody asked him to prove his rules They trusted it must be based on vast experience and research. Many of them shifted to KP only after practicing and experiencing better accuracy in (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . Similarly, there are many new theories like KB, Dr. Kar's Theory and 4 Step Theory etc. I am sure these are the results of untiring research and efforts by respective inventor. There may be some shortfalls/drawback s in each of them. There can be healthy discussion in the forum with an aim to improve, not asked to prove their respective theories. Even after giving proof through 100 cases, who is to certify it ? Where is the authority acceptable to all? Nobody has forced any member to follow certain theory. They are wise enough to choose the appropriate theory. These are my personal views. As far as 4 step Theory is concerned, I am 100% sure, Mr. Sunil Gondhalekar will welcome any constructive suggestion for improving the theory. Dr. Sheetal's observation "It is so interesting to see, whatever the topic of discussion, it cannot be completed without involvement of FOR STEP" is worth noting. Subhash Ektare -- - From: Sheetal ratnamalagg. com To: gro ups Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:35:40 PM Subject: Re: [] Re: Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Hello I am not very experienced, whatever I am writing is my understanding. 1.Though we need 100 cases to make/break the rule but when we get some finding constantly in few cases even 5-10 cases,u start getting clue that it may be the rule and start working further. And sometimes, we see even after 100 cases, established rule is not always correct.It is not the number only, but also the sincerity of the perosn who makes and breaks the rules (All knows how the data is collected for theisis and manipulations are made in drawing conclusions before submission many times!!!) 2. It is so interesting to see, whatever the topic of discussion, it can not be completed without involvement "FOUR STEP". In horary, the rule "retrograde planet or star doesnt give the result" is disproving slowly and is written by many. Also some have written that it delays the result and dosnt deny. I also feel it delays the result but with only few examples I can't claim. In four steps, it doesn't give result in transit means Mr Sunil didn't write any thing against his statement of retrograde planet not giving the result. Actually after coming to the conclusion that perticular incidence will happen in this vidasha, then we have to see the transit and if Dasha lords are transiting through retrograde star and sub (in only in 1st 2 steps) will not give the result in that perticular transit as retrograde planet has a delaying effect and so till that time it passess through another sub or star. It seem to be very simple only after understanding 4step thoroughly. Regards Dr Sheetal On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:12 PM, tw853 tw853. com wrote: Dear Friend, 1. No rule works for each and every chart. The rules are usually set on the basis of majority outcome of the charts studied. The life of each and every native is not set like in the mathematical equation. That is why we'are still far away fron near cent percent accuracy of (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) . 2. Breaking a rule and making a rule are two sides of a coin. Breaking a rule is generally making a opposite rule. For instance, by saying Guruji KSK's retrogression is not working in one's experience, it is making a rule of no retrogression in horary. By saying so more obligation is to provide a proof of supporting charts. 3. If retrograde is not working in 'horary, natal and RPs', how can retrograde work in checking transit's agreement with DBA is food for thought for logical reasoning. Thanks and regards, tw In gro ups, "dubeyamitkumar" dubeyamitkumar . wrote: Respected sir I have great respect for you but here I disagree with you in this "standard requirement is 100 charts to break a rule".I beleive that even 2-3 chart is enough for this but offcourse to make a rule atleast 100 charts should be required. If rule really works then it should work in each and every chart with least exception for same type of query. With Regards AMIT In gro ups, "tw853" tw853 wrote: A KP beginner is to follow Guruji KSK till at least 50 horary charts (standard requirement is 100 charts to break a rule.) have been posted showing Guruji KSK's retrogression is not working. Shri Kuppu Ganapathi and Shri Bhatt (except in special cases) are the same as Guruji KSK. Up to now any single practical chart has not yet been posted in this regard other than here say one's experience. To break a rule deeds other than words are needed. Regards, tw In gro ups, "sunilalaka" sunilalaka wrote: dear friends, what beginners to follow? KSK/Kuppuganapati or CR Bhatt? -sunil gondhalekar In gro ups, "tw853" tw853 wrote: Dear Friends, 1. Let me put the question straight: what did Shri Hasbe write in any of his books or teach regarding retrogressionn after directly learning from Guruji KSK-- Quote- "our GREAT GURUJI has categorically stated in HIS lectures and writings that retrograde Planets do not give results if they come as Star/Sub Lords to the Significators. ." -Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi (Guidelines for Preparing and Judging a Horary Chart as per K.P. or K.P. Principles in KPEZine) (A learner direct from Guruji KSK) Unquote 2. As far as my tracing system goes, Mr. Sunil Gondhalekar has never ever said in his 4 step book or any internet discussion that his view on retrogression is Shri Hasbe's, other than saying his experience based on the application of mainly natal, rarely horary. Thanks and regards, tw In gro ups, Subhash Ektare subhash_ektare wrote: Dear Member, It is a fact that Late Shri Jyotindra Hasbe learned KP directly from Guruji KSK. He has written 4 books on KP, of course all in Marathi. Shri Sunil Gondhalekar was practicing traditional Vedic Astrology from 1970. He met Shri Hasbe Guruji during 1980 and shifted to KP. Shri Gondhalekar was Hasbe Guruji's direct disciple. So he can throw some light on views of Hasbe Guruji about retrogression. It may be brought to the notice of members that Late Shri Hasbe was to start a magazine to spread KP in Maharashtra. But due to his untimely demise he could not fulfill his dream. Shri Sunil Gondhalekar fulfilled this dream and is editing and publishing a magazine "Nakshatrache Dene", in Marathi, since Diwali 1993 till date. In every magazine he writes that this was original idea of Late Hasbe Guruji. Regards Subhash Ektare -- - From: tw853 tw853 To: gro ups Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 5:46:17 AM Subject: [] Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression Dear Friends, Could any one kindly share Shri Hasbe's view on retrogression as he is from the first generation who learned directly from Guruji KSK like Shri Kuppu Ganapathi. Thanks and regards, tw Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19759
Dear Sundar Give some events like date of marriage, first child birth date, profession, etc. to verify the birth time after rectification with Ruling Planets.   Further, the birth time rectifiation in 4 step differ from k.p.   Dhanabalan On Mon, 9/22/08, sundar190561 sundar190561. wrote: From: sundar190561 sundar190561.Subject: [] Birth time rectificationTo: Date: Monday, September 22, 2008, 5:33 AM In my case, the asc is exactly on the cusp between Aquarius & Pisces. A change in timing of 2 to 4 minutes will take the ascendant from Aquarius to Pisces and due to this the house lordships will urdergo a change. Secondly, if two persons take up the rectification by "ruling planets" from two diametrically opposite continents, the ruling planets will also be different. In such a case how does one go about rectification of chart.I have given my birth details below:DOB: 22nd June, 1961TOB: 23:38 (IST)POB: Bhimavaram, AP, Lat:16N32, Long:81E32Could any of the experts throw light on this.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19760
  || Om Gurave Namah ||Hare Ram Krishna Dear Sujat Karambelkar, I do not know but assume by Indian Traditional Astroogy you mean vedic astrology in line of Parashar and Jaimini. If yes, Concept of  grah  Dristi implies infuence exerted by People on matters of houses/signs aspected.Here people are like planets. "Pratiyog ", if i gether terminology correct You are using for oppossition. In vedic again seventh aspect is a type of relationship infuence on each other planets so placed.It implies Sambandh, yoga in essence. It is totally different in meaning as taken in western astrology.It will be nice if you read BPHS having  good commentry with sanskrit or learn from Teacher. Above hints are just a few points related to sevnth aspect. Believe me Very few astrologer (Consult Indian Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) know about sevenh aspect of parashar correctly and adequately.All understanding got by translatons are absurd of Stanza 10  to 16 of ch on aspect of the signs called "tenth" chapter of Brihat parashar hora sastra. with best wishes.  OM TATSATSwami_RCSrivastava  AstrologerTeaching & Consultations:\\kaalvastu] --" Let us meditate on the glorious effulgence of that Divine Being who hascreated the three worlds.May He Direct our understanding."-- -- -- From: sujatkaram To: Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:18 PM Subject: [] Seventh aspect. Respected Members,Sir,Because I have not studied Indian Traditional astrology, I am putting this quary to the knowledgable members of this forum:-Is 7th aspect of any planet considered detremental to the results offered by that planet? What happens if two planets are in "Pratiyog"?They are said to be in Opposition to each other.Individual opinions are not important. I wish to know whether anything has been clearly mentioned in theory.Will any learned member pl. oblige?regards,sujat karambelkar.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19761
Dear Bhaskar ji,   You are missing one point. I am not saying that, I cannot do it. The point here is any horoscope before it is taken up for analysis, has to be rectified. Am I correct?   Further, If I as a layman go I to two different astrlogers (by e) say with a gap of 1 year, then the first KP astrologer (Consult Indian Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) (in mumbai) would have done his rectification. After a gap of 1 year, I go to another KP astrologer (Consult Indian Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) (in USA), he would also do the rectification.   In the above case, if the 2nd astrologer (Consult Indian Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) arrives at Pisces asc based on the RP, and also provides his (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) s, then, isn't it absurd.     ThanksSundar  On Mon, 22/9/08, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish. wrote: From: Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish.Subject: [] Re: Birth time rectificationTo: Date: Monday, 22 September, 2008, 1:26 PM Dear Sundar ji, I am no expert on Kp, but you dont need an expert to do this.   First of all why do you need to consult two people from 2 continents at the same time ? That would be absurd. Secondly why do you need anyone at all, if you know this much about Ruling planets.   Out of curiosity I just checked the RP's now at Bombay 22nd September. Time is 13.15.22  ( jagannath Hora software used ).   I get Sagittarius rising. Moon in Rahu star.  Moon in Raashi of Mercury. Day is Monday Asc. star is ketu.   If You look further than asc.SL is jupiter.   Saturn does not appear anywhere.   Try to rectify your time keeping Pisces asc. as base in mind, and verify the events as per dashas running alongwith the significators of the dasha Lords.   I am myself born near your birthplace at  Eluru in same month and year on June 28th 1961 I did my rectification myself and compared it with experts verdict afterwards. You must try the same.   regards, Bhaskar.  shrikrishnajyot ish         In gro ups, "sundar190561" sundar190561 . wrote: In my case, the asc is exactly on the cusp between Aquarius & Pisces. A change in timing of 2 to 4 minutes will take the ascendant from Aquarius to Pisces and due to this the house lordships will urdergo a change. Secondly, if two persons take up the rectification by "ruling planets" from two diametrically opposite continents, the ruling planets will also be different. In such a case how does one go about rectification of chart. I have given my birth details below: DOB: 22nd June, 1961 TOB: 23:38 (IST) POB: Bhimavaram, AP, Lat:16N32, Long:81E32 Could any of the experts throw light on this. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage.
Indian Astrology, Palmistry, Numerology, Vaastu, Vedic Astrology - 19762
   || Om Gurave Namah ||Hare Ram Krishna Dear Friends, The Birth data and time line  was given on list by Honourable TW ji, I verified DBAS for  five events but detectd MY softwares were selected for KP OLD Ayanamsa, since I was studying old cases OF A&A Magazines.Obviously further study was aimless for Sh TW Ji gave DBAS taking KP NEW Ayanamsa. So I shared Charts  casted. Awaiting opinion and study results from experts.  OM TATSATSwami_RCSrivastava  AstrologerTeaching & Consultations:\\kaalvastu] --" Let us meditate on the glorious effulgence of that Divine Being who hascreated the three worlds.May He Direct our understanding."-- -- -- From: Sagar S To: Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:19 AM Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a year Dear SWami   Thanks for the A Einstean birth details and chart. Sahhasra Saagara On Fri, 19/9/08, swami swamikaalvastu wrote: From: swami swamikaalvastuSubject: Re: [] Re: days in a yearTo: Date: Friday, 19 September, 2008, 7:12 PM   || Om Gurave Namah ||Hare Ram Krishna Dear friends, The whole exercise boils down to determination of correct Suksham except some events as not only Sub lords of joint period rulers are different but Antra lords are also different. So Events that have Antra and Sukhama different are more important. I did not upgraded to version 3 of KP Astro but purchased earlier version of this software so I am appending calculations based on J Deepaka. I am giving report of four step theory as well as report of Sub lord speaks theory, using KPN Ayanamsa in first part. In Second part I have used KP old, assuming, it is example of previous century for study purpose. Surprisingly This exercise calls for attention toward. 1. Similarity between Sub lord speaks and Four step having little additional considerations if one goes by report generated by Software. 2. Events are more justified by 360 days scheme. The bottom line is In Horary use of 365 / 360 days may not matter much for events are close to hands say within five years to time question is asked . BUT in BC it is important to know that what works?. Corrections and comments will be enlightening.  OM TATSAT Swami_RCSrivastava  AstrologerTeaching & Consultations:\\kaalvast u] --" Let us meditate on the glorious effulgence of that Divine Being who hascreated the three worlds.May He Direct our understanding. " -- -- -- From: tw853 To: gro ups Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 6:53 PM Subject: [] Re: days in a year Dear Friend, To show your own way, could you kindly start a practical study with any of your charts or the chart provided below.  More than hundreds of charts can be provided depending on the progress of your job.  I've never come across or can't imagine that a research astrologer (Consult Indian Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) can be so low to manipulate the data. Never mind, please go ahead with any chart. Doing something is much better than just saying only. Thanks and regards, tw Albert Einstein, Mar 14, 1879, 11:30 AM (1hr East of GMT), (AA Rated, Courtesy of AstroDatabank) , Ulm, Germany, 48N24, 10E00, Asc  Ge 19:33:56, Moon Sc 22:26:41, Mercury Dasa Bal 9Y:7M:18D, New KPA 22:04:51 ( KPAstro 3.0) Timeline (First DBAS as per 365 d/y and second DBAS as per 360 d/y) 1) 23-06-1902 (Ve-Ma-Me-Ve) [Ve-Ma-Me-Sa ]  joined  first  job 2) 06-01-1903 (Ve-Ra-Ra-Ra)  [Ve-Ra-Ra-Ju ]  married 3) 15-01-1906 (Ve-Ju-Ju-Ju)  [Ve-Ju-Ju-Ve ]  got PhD 4) 13-05-1910 (Ve-Sa-Su-Ra)  [Ve-Sa-Mo-Ju ]  became assistant professor 5) 01-04-1911 (Ve-Sa-Ra-Ve)  [Ve-Sa-Ju-Sa ]  became professor 6) 14-02-1919 (Su-Sa-Ve-Ju)  [Su-Sa-Ve-Me ]  divorce from first wife 7) 02-06-1919 (Su-Sa-Ra-Sa)  [Su-Sa-Ra-Ve ]  married second  wife 8) 10-12-1922 (Mo-Ma-Sa-Ra)  [Mo-Ma-Sa-Ju ]  won Nobel  Prize 9) 19-10-1933 (Ma-Ju-Ve-Mo)  [Ma-Ju-Ve-Ra ]  moved to US 10) 20-12-1936 (Ma-Ve-Su-Sa)  [Ma-Ve-Mo-Sa ] death of second wife 11) 18-04-1955 (Ra-Mo-Me-Ra)  [Ra-Mo-Ve-Mo ] death In gro ups, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology . wrote: Dear Friend, Of course.Anyone can have his own way. I have more than 50 charts, rather in hundreds with me. Let me give a suggestion. Take it if you like it or just drop it. I won't mind. Please try to compare at least 5 to 10 charts to start with. Cast two charts for a native, one with 365.25 days and the other with 360 days. Check out a few past events and see for yourself. Then one can come to a conclusion. With thanks and warm regards, MK (Mohan Kumar.R.) Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English Tutor Advanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based) 219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006 Cell: 99443-07025 -- - From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan . To: gro ups Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:42:42 PM Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a year Dear Mohankumar They have discussed in depth in all aspect but could not come to a conclusion. Therefore they have decided to follow what Mr.KSK said. Even if we start the discussion on this subject, we can not come to a conclusion accepted by all. So we can concentrate in some other topics, leaving it as 365.24 days. If any one is getting correct (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) with 360 days, it should be proved for at least 50 charts. Dhanabalan On Wed, 9/17/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology wrote: From: Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a year To: gro ups Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:52 AM Dear Friends. "This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK , If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK. We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason? What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year calculation and the (Read: Planets are Second to God by Vedic Astrologer S.M.Pinaki) also comes out true? In such case, a person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular event We cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter. With thanks and warm regards, MK (Mohan Kumar.R.) Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English Tutor Advanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based) 219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006 Cell: 99443-07025 -- - From: Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan To: gro ups Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PM Subject: Re: [] Re: days in a year Dear Agarwal The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading. Dhanabalan On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in agarwal_dphot. com wrote: From: dpa54in agarwal_dphot. com Subject: [] Re: days in a year To: gro ups Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM one has to calculate or use available software In gro ups, rao chitturu csr162002 wrote: Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use with 365 days a year On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in agarwal_dp . wrote: From: dpa54in agarwal_dp . Subject: [] days in a year To: gro ups Date: Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better results. Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. , on help. / l/in// // tools/tools- 08.html/ Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage.



Analysed 80051 Horoscopes So Far.



♈   ♉   ♊   ♋   ♌   ♍   ♎   ♏   ♐   ♑   ♒   ♓  


Fraternally yours,
S.M.Pinaki (PalmAstrologer)
Certified Professional Palmist, Astrologer and Numerologist
(New Delhi, India)

Email: astrologerofastrologers@gmail.com
I never demand/expect money. I have attained some command on Astrology, Numerology, Palmistry, vaastu and Tarrot by the grace of God and if I help anyone nothing is expected in return. If a person needs specific remedies, then I have to do a lot of hard work on his/her details which consumes a lot of precious time. Only in that case I demand a petty amount(Yes it is a petty amount as compared to the money charged by some so called Money-monger-commerce-driven Astrologers, Palmists, Numerologists whom K.N.Rao Saheb called Compu-idiots)

Let me repeat! Contact me ONLY 'If you are in deep trouble and all other doors are closed. Kindly do not take me for granted as another Head in the Mob of Commerce-driven Astrologers, Palmists, Numerologists and other similar practitioners.

Urgent Consultation if required, should be Clearly Mentioned in the message section of the contact form.

P.S. There is no need of personal appointment. Most of the time I m out of this Jungle of Concrete (My City), hence it is also practically very difficult. But rest assured I consider an Email equivalent to presence of the Person.


Free Consultation Form

Consultation Charges




by S.M.Pinaki



Find us on Google+












Top


Spiritual Clip


More Spiritual Clips




Ask Google Ask S.M.Pinaki



Home
Horoscopes of Celebrities
About the Author
Astrology
Spiritual Sciences
Remedies
Horoscopes of Visitors

Spiritual Clips
Astrology Clips
Footpath Astrology
Random Astrology
Visitor's Comments
Distance Healing
Spiritual Books
Donations



In no uncertain terms I want to make it absolutely clear that no art or science is absolutely perfect. Hence, any prediction that you receive from me is not to be considered as a substitute for advice, program, or treatment that you would normally receive from a licensed professional such as a lawyer, doctor, psychiatricst, or financial advisor. I provide no gurantees, implied warranties, or assurances of any kind, and will not be responsible for any interpretation made or use by te recipient of the information and data mentioned above. By the Grace of God I can only try to give my best and hope that my efforts will improve the life of my diciples, devotees and clients.

All rights reserved. Universal Copyrights (Sans USA) - 60021050 and 80029001 (2011-2015)


Top



astrologers_gp_kps
astrologers_gp_kps
astrologers_50_million
astrologers-palmists-numerologists
astrologers-palmists-numerologists-vaastu
astrologers-palmists-numerologists-vaastu/F_001
astrologers-palmists




This page provides information on:
astrologers gp kps